<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Investing Notes from The AntiGuru</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investingnotes.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investingnotes.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts, observations and opinions from the host of The AntiGuru Radio Show</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:15:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Podcast Episode One &#8211; May 11, 2009 by Steven</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/05/11/podcast-episode-one/comment-page-1/#comment-3064</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/?p=729#comment-3064</guid>
		<description>Hello Tim,

I saw your post on Magic Bullets to check out your podcast. It sounds fine. The audio is fine.

A suggestion - Put some text at the top to point people where to click to start the podcast. I&#039;m used to the YouTube video where you know where to click. It took me a minute to figure out where the podcast was. The slim black just didn&#039;t sink in for a minute.

If you haven&#039;t seen it yet, you might want to check out (Free) Easy Video producer. You can do up to 20 video or audio recordings for free. You don&#039;t have to sign up for the paid version.

Here is a link:

http://www.easyvideoproducer.com/clickthru.php?id=16629

Here is a sample I did for Real Estate people:

http://freearea.easyvideoproducer.com/Stevecd/2990/

Best regards,

Steven Currie
931-648-9813  
stevencurrie2@bellsouth.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Tim,</p>
<p>I saw your post on Magic Bullets to check out your podcast. It sounds fine. The audio is fine.</p>
<p>A suggestion &#8211; Put some text at the top to point people where to click to start the podcast. I&#8217;m used to the YouTube video where you know where to click. It took me a minute to figure out where the podcast was. The slim black just didn&#8217;t sink in for a minute.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t seen it yet, you might want to check out (Free) Easy Video producer. You can do up to 20 video or audio recordings for free. You don&#8217;t have to sign up for the paid version.</p>
<p>Here is a link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.easyvideoproducer.com/clickthru.php?id=16629" rel="nofollow">http://www.easyvideoproducer.c.....p?id=16629</a></p>
<p>Here is a sample I did for Real Estate people:</p>
<p><a href="http://freearea.easyvideoproducer.com/Stevecd/2990/" rel="nofollow">http://freearea.easyvideoprodu.....vecd/2990/</a></p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Steven Currie<br />
931-648-9813<br />
<a href="mailto:stevencurrie2@bellsouth.net">stevencurrie2@bellsouth.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will the Imputed Income Concept Return? by Ani</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2008/07/02/will-the-imputed-income-concept-return/comment-page-1/#comment-3040</link>
		<dc:creator>Ani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/?p=283#comment-3040</guid>
		<description>This is just blatant fear-mongering. Come on, really? Is there even a bill before Congress to get this in place? No, there isn&#039;t. This is a long-shot possibility at best, and if it were seriously proposed, the cries would be heard round the country. The Realtor lobbyists alone would be up in arms, not to mention several others. And let&#039;s not forget that Congress is full of homeowners, many of whom we now know got sweetheart mortgages from their pals and Fannie and Freddie. You can bet they&#039;ll be looking out for their own self-interest as investors too. It wouldn&#039;t exactly be difficult to kill a bill like this, IF it were even proposed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just blatant fear-mongering. Come on, really? Is there even a bill before Congress to get this in place? No, there isn&#8217;t. This is a long-shot possibility at best, and if it were seriously proposed, the cries would be heard round the country. The Realtor lobbyists alone would be up in arms, not to mention several others. And let&#8217;s not forget that Congress is full of homeowners, many of whom we now know got sweetheart mortgages from their pals and Fannie and Freddie. You can bet they&#8217;ll be looking out for their own self-interest as investors too. It wouldn&#8217;t exactly be difficult to kill a bill like this, IF it were even proposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Confidence Is Strong Enough To Not Require A Political Litmus Test by Tim</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/my-confidence-is-strong-enough-to-not-require-a-poloitical-litmus-test/comment-page-1/#comment-2456</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/my-confidence-is-strong-enough-to-not-require-a-poloitical-litmus-test/#comment-2456</guid>
		<description>An update...

This morning I received an email from this former member asking me to remove this post. I am not going to do that. I have not identified this person in any way and while they spent a lot of time on the Field Guide during the time they were a member they did not interact with many other members. Therefore, it is unlikely other members will be able to identify this person.

See, I think they acted impulsively. They said they were offended with my interaction with some liberals on twitter. What they were referring to is some of my interactions on posts in the #tcot stream. Twitter allows you to add a tag, called a hash tag because it is the # followed by the tag, in this case #tcot to a tweet. This makes it easy to essentially participate in a big public chat room. Well, #tcot, is stands for Top Conservatives On Twitter. The &quot;top&quot; part doesn&#039;t mean all that much. Being a conservative discussion thread it attracts those who vehemently disagree with the discussion. 

Disagreement, of course, is not a problem. But, it attracts &quot;trolls&quot; whose sole purpose is to stir up controversy where none existed before. I, like many who post tweets to #tcot, have attracted the attention of the trolls from time to time. I have tried to discuss things with them, probably more than I should, but hey, I am human.

Now, I do not know if this former member is one I had some kind of interaction with on twitter or not, but I suspect that might be the case.

I guess at the end of the day, I kind of have the same question and opinion Cindy does about this. 

And, yes, I could have let this just slip quietly into the night. But, I didn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An update&#8230;</p>
<p>This morning I received an email from this former member asking me to remove this post. I am not going to do that. I have not identified this person in any way and while they spent a lot of time on the Field Guide during the time they were a member they did not interact with many other members. Therefore, it is unlikely other members will be able to identify this person.</p>
<p>See, I think they acted impulsively. They said they were offended with my interaction with some liberals on twitter. What they were referring to is some of my interactions on posts in the #tcot stream. Twitter allows you to add a tag, called a hash tag because it is the # followed by the tag, in this case #tcot to a tweet. This makes it easy to essentially participate in a big public chat room. Well, #tcot, is stands for Top Conservatives On Twitter. The &#8220;top&#8221; part doesn&#8217;t mean all that much. Being a conservative discussion thread it attracts those who vehemently disagree with the discussion. </p>
<p>Disagreement, of course, is not a problem. But, it attracts &#8220;trolls&#8221; whose sole purpose is to stir up controversy where none existed before. I, like many who post tweets to #tcot, have attracted the attention of the trolls from time to time. I have tried to discuss things with them, probably more than I should, but hey, I am human.</p>
<p>Now, I do not know if this former member is one I had some kind of interaction with on twitter or not, but I suspect that might be the case.</p>
<p>I guess at the end of the day, I kind of have the same question and opinion Cindy does about this. </p>
<p>And, yes, I could have let this just slip quietly into the night. But, I didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Incrementally, It All Appears To Make Sense by Burke</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/incrementally-it-all-appears-to-make-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-2452</link>
		<dc:creator>Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 23:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/incrementally-it-all-appears-to-make-sense/#comment-2452</guid>
		<description>To take this a step further, not only might these companies be forced out of business because they can&#039;t recruit and keep good talent as a result of the pay caps, but now there is less competition in the marketplace which is always a bad thing for the consumer.  So....our tax money is wasted and our cost of goods could potentially increase due to less competition.  We pay on both ends.

Someone please remind me again how this is such a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To take this a step further, not only might these companies be forced out of business because they can&#8217;t recruit and keep good talent as a result of the pay caps, but now there is less competition in the marketplace which is always a bad thing for the consumer.  So&#8230;.our tax money is wasted and our cost of goods could potentially increase due to less competition.  We pay on both ends.</p>
<p>Someone please remind me again how this is such a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Confidence Is Strong Enough To Not Require A Political Litmus Test by Cindy</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/my-confidence-is-strong-enough-to-not-require-a-poloitical-litmus-test/comment-page-1/#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/my-confidence-is-strong-enough-to-not-require-a-poloitical-litmus-test/#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>I wonder how much of a problem this would be if the situation were reversed.  He lay awake because he paid money to a conservative, but if he had bought the property he was discussing with you and later SOLD it to a conservative, would he lay awake because he had taken money from a conservative?  

Maybe he needs to think about ALL aspects of his business!!

Just my opinion, but then I too am a conservative, but I hope one with an open mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much of a problem this would be if the situation were reversed.  He lay awake because he paid money to a conservative, but if he had bought the property he was discussing with you and later SOLD it to a conservative, would he lay awake because he had taken money from a conservative?  </p>
<p>Maybe he needs to think about ALL aspects of his business!!</p>
<p>Just my opinion, but then I too am a conservative, but I hope one with an open mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Confidence Is Strong Enough To Not Require A Political Litmus Test by Debbie</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/my-confidence-is-strong-enough-to-not-require-a-poloitical-litmus-test/comment-page-1/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/my-confidence-is-strong-enough-to-not-require-a-poloitical-litmus-test/#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>Halfway reading it, my thought was that (I&#039;ll name him &quot;X&quot;) &quot;X&quot; started his concern because of his political belief. Personally, I don&#039;t know what the political belief has to do with being an investor but whatever float his boat. As I continued reading, I noticed it morphed into his appreciativeness and your kindness in which he may not have experienced enough of. 

Therefore, totally separate issue. Nothing wrong with that.

Well, I was only partly wrong. Wrong because as soon as I read &quot;X&quot;&#039;s expectation of finishing the deal with you as his mentor, I realized he attempted to take advantage of your kindness. UGH! Nice going, &quot;X&quot;!

To his credit, he did asked...... *I&#039;m being sarcastic here*

But, at least, I was right about the morphing into a non-political part.....*giggle*

So here&#039;s my message to &quot;X&quot;-----You&#039;ll need to sit back and re-evaluate yourself and learn what you really want. Don&#039;t use anything or anybody as an excuse for anything. Tim did not bring or create problem to you. You brought the problem onto yourself. You hoped that Tim would rectify your problem in part but instead, in reality, he rectified the symptom of your problem in whole (i.e. full refund). Tim and no other human being can resolve your problem, only you can resolve your problem. If the problem is truly about political belief and it&#039;s hindering you personally and/or professionally, then you need to eliminate your political belief and your problem will cease to exist.

Something for you to think about.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halfway reading it, my thought was that (I&#8217;ll name him &#8220;X&#8221;) &#8220;X&#8221; started his concern because of his political belief. Personally, I don&#8217;t know what the political belief has to do with being an investor but whatever float his boat. As I continued reading, I noticed it morphed into his appreciativeness and your kindness in which he may not have experienced enough of. </p>
<p>Therefore, totally separate issue. Nothing wrong with that.</p>
<p>Well, I was only partly wrong. Wrong because as soon as I read &#8220;X&#8221;&#8217;s expectation of finishing the deal with you as his mentor, I realized he attempted to take advantage of your kindness. UGH! Nice going, &#8220;X&#8221;!</p>
<p>To his credit, he did asked&#8230;&#8230; *I&#8217;m being sarcastic here*</p>
<p>But, at least, I was right about the morphing into a non-political part&#8230;..*giggle*</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s my message to &#8220;X&#8221;&#8212;&#8211;You&#8217;ll need to sit back and re-evaluate yourself and learn what you really want. Don&#8217;t use anything or anybody as an excuse for anything. Tim did not bring or create problem to you. You brought the problem onto yourself. You hoped that Tim would rectify your problem in part but instead, in reality, he rectified the symptom of your problem in whole (i.e. full refund). Tim and no other human being can resolve your problem, only you can resolve your problem. If the problem is truly about political belief and it&#8217;s hindering you personally and/or professionally, then you need to eliminate your political belief and your problem will cease to exist.</p>
<p>Something for you to think about&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Confidence Is Strong Enough To Not Require A Political Litmus Test by Tim</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/my-confidence-is-strong-enough-to-not-require-a-poloitical-litmus-test/comment-page-1/#comment-2447</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/my-confidence-is-strong-enough-to-not-require-a-poloitical-litmus-test/#comment-2447</guid>
		<description>Jerry,

Please indulge me while I try to comprehend the obvious wisdom you have bestowed upon the discussion...

You think it is fine to avoid working with and buying from people who have differing political views. You obviously think it is a good thing I refunded the money so this person can sleep at night.

I&#039;m pretty sure I understand that part. I am not sure how you satisfy your daily needs since so many consumer goods and services are supplied by conservatives like myself. At any given point in time about half the population lean conservative and half lean liberal.

Perhaps you could share with us how you determine the political leanings of any product or service provider prior to purchase.

Then you call me a jerk and a prick because I am reluctant to continue to work with someone who so adamantly does not want to compensate me in even the trivial amount of the Field Guide membership fee.

So, presumably, it would be a good thing in your eyes to work with someone who differs from me in their political views as long as the conservative in the transaction does it for free?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry,</p>
<p>Please indulge me while I try to comprehend the obvious wisdom you have bestowed upon the discussion&#8230;</p>
<p>You think it is fine to avoid working with and buying from people who have differing political views. You obviously think it is a good thing I refunded the money so this person can sleep at night.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure I understand that part. I am not sure how you satisfy your daily needs since so many consumer goods and services are supplied by conservatives like myself. At any given point in time about half the population lean conservative and half lean liberal.</p>
<p>Perhaps you could share with us how you determine the political leanings of any product or service provider prior to purchase.</p>
<p>Then you call me a jerk and a prick because I am reluctant to continue to work with someone who so adamantly does not want to compensate me in even the trivial amount of the Field Guide membership fee.</p>
<p>So, presumably, it would be a good thing in your eyes to work with someone who differs from me in their political views as long as the conservative in the transaction does it for free?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Confidence Is Strong Enough To Not Require A Political Litmus Test by Jerry</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/my-confidence-is-strong-enough-to-not-require-a-poloitical-litmus-test/comment-page-1/#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/my-confidence-is-strong-enough-to-not-require-a-poloitical-litmus-test/#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t blame them for not wanting to give money to someone who doesnt support their views.

You are proving you are a jerk by not helping them close their deal too.

At least you have been exposed for the prick you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t blame them for not wanting to give money to someone who doesnt support their views.</p>
<p>You are proving you are a jerk by not helping them close their deal too.</p>
<p>At least you have been exposed for the prick you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Confidence Is Strong Enough To Not Require A Political Litmus Test by Dan Smythe</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/my-confidence-is-strong-enough-to-not-require-a-poloitical-litmus-test/comment-page-1/#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Smythe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/04/01/my-confidence-is-strong-enough-to-not-require-a-poloitical-litmus-test/#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>Holy Crap! You are a conservative? OMG! Run for the hills!

Seriously, this is the type of childishness that keeps people from succeeding and always blaming others. You did the right thing in refunding the money and killing the account. You should refer them to a solid liberal or someone willing to pretend to be a liberal to help them from this point on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy Crap! You are a conservative? OMG! Run for the hills!</p>
<p>Seriously, this is the type of childishness that keeps people from succeeding and always blaming others. You did the right thing in refunding the money and killing the account. You should refer them to a solid liberal or someone willing to pretend to be a liberal to help them from this point on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Card Check Or Why Unions Fear the Secret Ballot by Crotchedy Old Man</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/25/card-check-or-why-unions-fear-the-secret-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-2435</link>
		<dc:creator>Crotchedy Old Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/25/card-check-or-why-unions-fear-the-secret-ballot/#comment-2435</guid>
		<description>WOW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Card Check Or Why Unions Fear the Secret Ballot by Kelly</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/25/card-check-or-why-unions-fear-the-secret-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-2417</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/25/card-check-or-why-unions-fear-the-secret-ballot/#comment-2417</guid>
		<description>My Daddy was a union member all his adult life and I am too. We can&#039;t allow these fat cat employers to take our jobs and ship them overseas. We have to stick together and demand our rights to our jobs.

EFCA all the way baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Daddy was a union member all his adult life and I am too. We can&#8217;t allow these fat cat employers to take our jobs and ship them overseas. We have to stick together and demand our rights to our jobs.</p>
<p>EFCA all the way baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CRM for Real Estate Investors by Davis Lee</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/17/crm-for-real-estate-investors/comment-page-1/#comment-2391</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/17/crm-for-real-estate-investors/#comment-2391</guid>
		<description>I used you to help be get quick books straightened out so I know anything you do here will be top notch. I&#039;d be interested if you offered a hosted version or install/admin on my servers at my host.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used you to help be get quick books straightened out so I know anything you do here will be top notch. I&#8217;d be interested if you offered a hosted version or install/admin on my servers at my host.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CRM for Real Estate Investors by Ted</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/17/crm-for-real-estate-investors/comment-page-1/#comment-2390</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/17/crm-for-real-estate-investors/#comment-2390</guid>
		<description>I know I need a better system than the one I use. I just can&#039;t justify the prices some are charging for this. 

If you do decide to offer a hosted option and the price is reasonable, I&#039;ll sign the 6 people in my group up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I need a better system than the one I use. I just can&#8217;t justify the prices some are charging for this. </p>
<p>If you do decide to offer a hosted option and the price is reasonable, I&#8217;ll sign the 6 people in my group up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will You Thrive or Just Survive? by Lamont T. Baker</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/02/will-you-thrive-or-just-survive/comment-page-1/#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamont T. Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/02/will-you-thrive-or-just-survive/#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>I will give my money to them who help them in need no body else</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will give my money to them who help them in need no body else</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will You Thrive or Just Survive? by Crotchedy Old Man</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/02/will-you-thrive-or-just-survive/comment-page-1/#comment-2378</link>
		<dc:creator>Crotchedy Old Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/02/will-you-thrive-or-just-survive/#comment-2378</guid>
		<description>So, I need some clarity Lamont.  By not &quot;giving it back&quot;, are you meaning you will no longer purchase clothing, food, transportation or housing?  If not, are you expecting the gov to purchase/take all the rental housing, grocery stores, car dealers, and department stores so that you can &quot;keep it&quot; and then give these items to you for nothing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I need some clarity Lamont.  By not &#8220;giving it back&#8221;, are you meaning you will no longer purchase clothing, food, transportation or housing?  If not, are you expecting the gov to purchase/take all the rental housing, grocery stores, car dealers, and department stores so that you can &#8220;keep it&#8221; and then give these items to you for nothing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will You Thrive or Just Survive? by Lamont T. Baker</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/02/will-you-thrive-or-just-survive/comment-page-1/#comment-2371</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamont T. Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/02/will-you-thrive-or-just-survive/#comment-2371</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah wonce We get it we wont give it back we will keep it so STFU!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah wonce We get it we wont give it back we will keep it so STFU!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will You Thrive or Just Survive? by Lamont T. Baker</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/02/will-you-thrive-or-just-survive/comment-page-1/#comment-2370</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamont T. Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/03/02/will-you-thrive-or-just-survive/#comment-2370</guid>
		<description>I seen your tweets and I would never do nothing with someone like you. You aint nothing but a right wing nut who thinks it fine if poor people just starve. You like it when poor people die becaus it leaves more for the likes of you. We aint going no where no how. We are taking everything away from people like you and redistributing it to the ones needing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seen your tweets and I would never do nothing with someone like you. You aint nothing but a right wing nut who thinks it fine if poor people just starve. You like it when poor people die becaus it leaves more for the likes of you. We aint going no where no how. We are taking everything away from people like you and redistributing it to the ones needing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Use The First Time House Buyer Credit to Unload Poor Performing Rentals by Tim</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/02/18/use-the-first-time-house-buyer-credit-to-unload-poor-performing-rentals/comment-page-1/#comment-2298</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/02/18/use-the-first-time-house-buyer-credit-to-unload-poor-performing-rentals/#comment-2298</guid>
		<description>JD, you are of course free to have whatever opinion you want. But, these first time home buyers have to buy from someone. The strategy I&#039;ve outlined in this post and at the Field Guide is a way for both a landlord with a marginal property and a first time buyer with credit issues to construct a great deal for both of them. 

You may not see the value in this approach from the standpoint of the buyer or the seller and that is fine too. But, if the intention of the program is as the President has advertised then they will be delighted to find people willing to help people buy homes and use the $8k credit to help in that process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD, you are of course free to have whatever opinion you want. But, these first time home buyers have to buy from someone. The strategy I&#8217;ve outlined in this post and at the Field Guide is a way for both a landlord with a marginal property and a first time buyer with credit issues to construct a great deal for both of them. </p>
<p>You may not see the value in this approach from the standpoint of the buyer or the seller and that is fine too. But, if the intention of the program is as the President has advertised then they will be delighted to find people willing to help people buy homes and use the $8k credit to help in that process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Use The First Time House Buyer Credit to Unload Poor Performing Rentals by JD</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/02/18/use-the-first-time-house-buyer-credit-to-unload-poor-performing-rentals/comment-page-1/#comment-2292</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/02/18/use-the-first-time-house-buyer-credit-to-unload-poor-performing-rentals/#comment-2292</guid>
		<description>They need to fix it so bottom feeders like you can&#039;t abuse this program like that. President Barack Obama didn&#039;t intend for you rich white folk to get richer off this. He intends it to help the least of our country afford a decent place to live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need to fix it so bottom feeders like you can&#8217;t abuse this program like that. President Barack Obama didn&#8217;t intend for you rich white folk to get richer off this. He intends it to help the least of our country afford a decent place to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It Was A Difficult Decision &#8211; But Long Over Due by Karl Quiggley</title>
		<link>http://investingnotes.com/2009/02/08/it-was-a-difficult-decision-but-long-over-due/comment-page-1/#comment-2256</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Quiggley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingnotes.com/2009/02/09/it-was-a-difficult-decision-but-long-over-due/#comment-2256</guid>
		<description>William, &lt;a href=&quot;http://fieldguide.reitactics.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://fieldguide.reitactics.com&lt;/a&gt; will get you there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William, <a href="http://fieldguide.reitactics.com" rel="nofollow">http://fieldguide.reitactics.com</a> will get you there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
